| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Beyond ExperienceUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, pollock{at}email.unc.edu In response to the essays by Brower, Adams, and Jones in this volume, this essay argues against the ocular-empiricism of eyewitness by which sight authenticates experience and experience authenticates the seeing-self. The logics that tie experiential fundamentalism to identity politics are inherently faulty and potentially regressive. They lock the "I" in a representational chain connecting thats what I saw; thats what happened; thats how things are; thats my/the story; thats who I am. Following Scott, the essay favors a critical/creative approach that immerses "experience" in political intervention and self-making.
Key Words: eyewitness experience testimony
This version was published on October
1, 2009 Cultural Studies <=> Critical Methodologies, Vol. 9, No. 5,
636-646 (2009) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||