This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1532708608327222v1 9/5/627    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Brower, J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Reflecting on the Experience of Injury at Virginia Tech

Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, jbrower{at}siu.edu

In the aftermath of the killing at Virginia Tech on April 16, 2007, a vast amount of media coverage has been dedicated to the personal accounts of those affected by the disaster. Guided by the presumption that a subject’s account of what he or she observes and feels faithfully reflects reality, the uncritical elevation of experience naturalizes accounts of injury produced by the event itself. Framed by Joan W. Scott’s examination of the evidence of experience, I consider how foundational treatments of experience are used to narrate the disaster, effectively leading to its dehistoricization. In response, I propose a reading of the event that considers the question, "What does it means to be injured?" as a starting point for historicizing experience.

Key Words: Virginia Tech • experience • Joan W. Scott • injury • disaster

This version was published on October 1, 2009

Cultural Studies <=> Critical Methodologies, Vol. 9, No. 5, 627-635 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1532708608327222


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?